1. Long-Distance Nationalism https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xcNGN5jwErWkNXfEUQXyuIy17inBozda/view?usp=sharing 
2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27270509_Long-Distance_Nationalism 
3. https://nationalismstudies.wordpress.com/2014/10/22/week-6-benedict-anderson-2/
4. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/680/chapter/132368/Long-Distance-Nationalism-Defined

Definition
Long-distance nationalism is a set of ide ntity claims and practices that connect people living in various geographical locations to a specific territory that they see as their ancestral home. Actions taken by long-distance nationalists on behalf of this reputed ancestral home may include voting, demonstrating, lobbying, contributing money, creating works of art, fighting, killing, and dying. Long-distance nationalism is closely connected to the classic notion of nationalism and the nation-state. As in other forms of nationalism, long-distant nationalists believe there is a nation that consists of a people who share a common history, identity, and territory. Long-distance nationalism differs from other forms of nationalism in terms of the nature of the relationship between the members of the nation and the national territory. National borders are not thought to delimit membership in the nation. The members of the nation may live anywhere around the globe and even hold...

References

1. Aleinikoff, A., & Klusmeyer, D. (Eds.). (2000). From migrants to citizens: Membership in a changing world. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for Peace.
2. American Immigration Center. (2003). Available at: http://www.usimmigration.com/information/dual—citizenship.htm
3. Anderson, B. (1993). The new world disorder. New Left Review, 193, 2–13.
4. Anderson, B. (1994). Exodus. Critical Inquiry, 20, 314–327. CrossRef
5. Anderson, B. (1998). The spectre of comparisons nationalism, Southeast Asia, and the world. London: Verso.
6. Çaglar, A. (2002). The discrete charm of dual citizenship: Citizenship ties, trust, and the “pink card.” In Y. Elkana, I. Krestev, E. Macamo, & S. Randeria (Eds.), Unraveling ties. From social cohesion to new practices of connectedness (pp. 248–262). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus Fachbuch
7. Calhoun, C. (1997). Nationalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
8. Feldman-Bianco, B. (2001). “Brazilians in Portugal, Portuguese in Brazil: Constructions of sameness and difference” Identities: global studies in culture and power, 8(4), 607–647
9. Fuglerud, Ø (1999). Life on the outside: The Tamil diaspora and long distance nationalism. London: Pluto.
10. Glazer, N. (1954). Ethnic groups in America: From national culture to ideology. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 158–173). New York: Van Nostrand.
11. Glick Schiller, N., & Fouron, G. (2001). Georges woke up laughing: Long distance nationalism and the search for home. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
12. Goodman, A. (1995). The Problematics of “Race”. In N. Boaz and L. Wolfe (Eds.), Biological Anthropology: The State of the Science (pp. 215–239). Bend, OR: International Institute for Human Evolutionary Research.
13. Graham, P. (2002). Political incorporation and re-incorporation: Simultaneity in the Dominican migrant experience. In H. Cordero-Guzman, R. Grosfoguel, & R. Smith (Eds.), Transnational communities and the political economy of New York in the 1990s (pp. 87–108). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14. Harrington, M. (1982). Loyalties: Dual and Divided. In S. Thernstrom (Ed.), The Politics of Ethnicity (pp. 104–115). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.r
15. Harrison, F. (1995). The persistent power of “race” in the cultural and political economy of racism. Annual Reviews in Anthropology, 24, 47–74.
16. Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
17. Javellana-Santos, J. (2003). Citizenship retention act signed into law. Philippine News On Line, September 2003.
18. Levitt, P. (2002). “Why should I retire to Florida when I can go to Lahore?”: Defining and explaining variations in transnational migration. Paper presented at the Emerging Architectures of Transnational Governance Conference, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
19. Louie, A. (2001). Crafting places through mobility: Chinese American “roots-searching” in China. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 8 (3), 343–380.
20. Marks, J. (1995). Human biodiversity: Genes, race, and history. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
21. Millbank, A. (2000). Dual citizenship in Australia. Current issues Brief No. 5, 2001–2. Available at: hrrp://ww.aph.gov.au/library/
22. Redding, J. (1958). Inside the democratic party. Indianapolis, In: Bobbs-Merrill.
23. Schermerhorn, R. A. (1949). These our people: Minorities in American culture. Boston: D. C. Heath.
24. Skrbiŝ, Z. (1999). Long distance nationalism: Diasporas, homelands and identities. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
25. Steward, M. (n.d.). The Hungarian status law: A new European form of transnational politics? Diaspora, 12(1), 67–102.
26. Suryadinata, L. (2002). China’s citizenship laws and the Chinese in Southeast Asia. In M. B. Hooker (Ed.), Law and the Chinese in Southeast Asia (pp. 169–202). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asia Studies.
27. Tölöyan, L. (2000). Elites and institutions in the Armenian transnation. Diaspora, 9(10), 107–136.
28. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. (2000). Illegal resident alien population. Available at: www.immigration.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/illegalalien/illegal.pdf 
29. Weed, P. (1973). The white ethnic movement and ethnic politics. New York: Praeger.
30. Wyman, M. (1993). Round-trip to America: The immigrants return to Europe, 1880–1930. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Book Summary
Imagined Communities, by Benedict Anderson
Book Rating by Shortform Readers: 4.8 (105 reviews)
In Imagined Communities, Benedict Anderson explores the phenomenon of nationalism. His core insight is that the concept of “the nation” has no basis in empirical reality, but is instead a purely political innovation that constructs a shared identity binding strangers from different communities together—usually on the basis of a shared language, history, culture, religion, or ethnicity. Thus, although a nation may consist of tens of millions of people—nearly all of whom will never personally know or even meet one another—nationalism allows each individual to think of themselves as a member of a singular community with a shared identity.

In this guide, we’ve added alternative viewpoints on the basis of nationalism, including psychological and anthropological perspectives. We've also added more historical context for Anderson's theories.

Read Full Summary
Browse Summary
Imagined Communities 

Not: Bu açıklamalar Antropolg Sefa Yürükel tarafından yapılmıştır.